Lockdown 2020: How living
slowly is changing your perception of nature
In my previous post I
talked about how taking the train, which is slower than flying, allowed me to
feel a deeper, more affective and embodied empathy for the environment. Delving
deeper into what allowed this empathy to emerge I was drawn to recent writings
about Slowness.
This idea of
Slowness has been gathering pace since 1986 when a group of Italian activists
protested against the opening of McDonalds in Italy. From this, the idea of
Slow Food emerged, arguing that fast food threatens our environment, lifestyle
and land. This idea then grew to other Slow movements such as Slow Cities which
are a push against globalisation through the resistance of the introduction of
monocultural amenities, creating new rhythms of life. Slow Education also
emerged in 2002 when Professor Maurice Holt called for an education which is
localised and unique and builds knowledge from within a local context. This
means that learners would understand their local environment more and how they
are situated within it. In short Slow movements prioritise local surroundings,
the natural environment and material backdrops 1
by taking the time to think and move within local areas. When Slowness is
enacted one has more time to ‘think, reflect and evaluate’ 2. So, moving slowly within one’s environment can
encourage a deeper reflection of its nuances and how one relates to it, from
which empathy towards it could emerge. This is what happened on my train
journey.
In March 2020 a
national lockdown was imposed on us in the UK to beat Coronavirus. This is
still ongoing. This means that many of must stay at home with only visits to
the shops for essential items or for one form of exercise per day. After three
weeks a review will take place, and stricter rules will be applied if people do
not stick to the lockdown. At first there was some confusion over what this
meant but people soon began to get into a routine of exercise and shopping.
Luckily we have been blessed by amazing weather and many faces have begun to
appear in my neighbourhood who I had never seen before, getting their daily
exercise. It seems that the threat of taking away the outdoors from people by
imposing further, stricter lockdown rules has increased interest in the outside
world and prompted people to enjoy their environment while they are allowed. Even
though I tend to appreciate the outdoors and get out as much as possible, I
also felt this and began to do long early morning walks on the moors (working
from home has added an extra hour or two to my day to allow me to do this).
Normally in daily life
attention can shift from the environment to immediate distractions such as
looking after children and talking to friends. This means that from day to day
humans are quite often not taking in their surroundings. However, soon after
lockdown was imposed, I began to notice that people were talking about the
outdoors more on social media and to me personally. People mentioned that they
noticed birds singing more and began to post photos of nature on their walks,
commenting on how lovely it was. Soon after that there was a social media trend
to post up pictures of previous beach trips. It seemed that people are
beginning to be more attentive to the outside world.
I have also
experienced this even though I would say that I am already quite attentive to
the environment as I have always appreciated nature and I write about it too.
Nevertheless, I also started to notice louder birdsong, the bees buzzing,
butterflies, new lambs bleating and foals enjoying life, more than usual. Maybe
I am in awe of the freedom they have and how they are unaware of what is going
on in the world right now? In addition, I have also noticed more nonhuman
animal interactions with humans. For example, in a tree outside my house a bird
was mimicking a barking dog. You can see the video below:
I have also heard a
bird singing to somebody whistling. Mimicking in birds is said to be a form of
communication between them and humans for survival purposes 3. So is this an affective empathy between nonhuman
and human occurring that I hadn’t really noticed before?
Basically, lockdown has forced
us to let go of our hectic, fast lifestyles slowing us down and as
a result we may have become more attentive to the environment. Being Slow in this
sense is about being attentive for your own pleasure rather than as a matter of
cause. This means that by moving ‘slower’ within the environment, you are
attentive to the surroundings purely for your enjoyment rather than for any
pressurised reason. Being attentive in this way opens the senses so that a
multisensory perception of experience can take place and opening the senses
allows for deeper embodiment. In short, the act of Slowness can enable a deeper
embodied, affective connection to the environment.
In other research I have
conducted I have found that an affective, embodied empathy for the environment
emerges when visiting the same place in the outdoors on a regular basis 4.
This means that if lockdown is extended people
may eventually feel a deeper connection to their local outdoors if they
haven’t
already. If this happens, evidence says that people are more likely to
take
action against the destruction of the environment. Let’s hope that one
good
thing that comes from lockdown is that the connection to the environment
that
people make during this time continues to have an impact way after
lockdown is
lifted so that people continually shout louder for the care of our
planet. With this virus emerging from humans' lack of care and awareness
to nonhuman species, I feel it is essential to connect deeper with our
environment at this time. Ironically, the lockdown has given us time to
do this. So
next time you are on your walk, open all of your senses that little bit
more
and see what emerges, and maybe by doing this we can avoid this
situation again....
1. Ulmer, J.B. (2017) Writing
Slow Ontology. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(3).
2. Parkins, W. (2004) Out of
Time: Fast Subjects and Slow Living. Time and Society, 13(2-3)
3. Frith, C & Frith, D
(2004) The Bowerbirds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Whitburn,
J; Linklater,
W & Abrahamse,
W (2019) Meta‐analysis of human
connection to nature and proenvironmental behavior. Conservation Biology,
34(1).
Thanks Heather - I'm certainly finding more time to connect to my own body and figure out my relationships with my local area - your blog has made me think about the difference between walking through the country and cycling through it - how much more you can notice when you're walking and giving into that rhythmic sensation of connection - you might find this website of interest - more about walking than slowness, but connected I think: https://walkinglab.org
ReplyDeleteHi thank you for this it looks really interesting - will take a further look. :)
Delete